In this study, we demonstrate that the norm test and inner product/orthogonality test presented in \cite{Bol18} are equivalent in terms of the convergence rates associated with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) methods if $\epsilon^2=\theta^2+\nu^2$ with specific choices of $\theta$ and $\nu$. Here, $\epsilon$ controls the relative statistical error of the norm of the gradient while $\theta$ and $\nu$ control the relative statistical error of the gradient in the direction of the gradient and in the direction orthogonal to the gradient, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the inner product/orthogonality test can be as inexpensive as the norm test in the best case scenario if $\theta$ and $\nu$ are optimally selected, but the inner product/orthogonality test will never be more computationally affordable than the norm test if $\epsilon^2=\theta^2+\nu^2$. Finally, we present two stochastic optimization problems to illustrate our results.

In this paper, we propose a stochastic optimization method that adaptively controls the sample size used in the computation of gradient approximations. Unlike other variance reduction techniques that either require additional storage or the regular computation of full gradients, the proposed method reduces variance by increasing the sample size as needed. The decision to increase the sample size is governed by an inner product test that ensures that search directions are descent directions with high probability. We show that the inner product test improves upon the well known norm test, and can be used as a basis for an algorithm that is globally convergent on nonconvex functions and enjoys a global linear rate of convergence on strongly convex functions. Numerical experiments on logistic regression problems illustrate the performance of the algorithm.